Recent Articles and Letters
Written by Our Members
and Others


July 6, 2011

Book Review: "Among the Truthers" by William Willers


May 10, 2011

Responses to questions regarding thermite, nanothermite and conventional explosives used in the WTC destruction by Steven Jones, 911Blogger.com.


January 19, 2011
Released April 15, 2011

Letters to John P. Holdren, the Department of Commerce, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the National Science Foundation by members of Scientists. Note: In these copies, the sender's address has been replaced by Scientists' PO Box address.


March 19, 2011

An Open Letter to Bill Moyers by William Willers and others. The letter was in response to a speech by Bill Moyers at the History Makers 2011 convention on January 27, 2011, in New York City.


March 07, 2011

A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse by Michael Fullerton, Foreign Policy Journal.


February 22, 2011

Letter to the Canadian Minister of Public Safety by Kip Warner. Responses to this letter by officials and others can also be seen at this location.


November 18, 2010

Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11 by Kevin Ryan, Foreign Policy Journal.


September 15, 2010

Letter to the Department of Commerce by Timothy E. Eastman.


Welcome

Welcome to our website and Home page. If you are new to the findings of independent, scientific research on the events of September 11, 2001 (9/11), please begin by clicking Introduction.

NEXUS Magazine

NEXUS Magazine
Number 85

French Magazine Features Consensus 9/11 Points

March, 2013

The Consensus Panel, a site devoted to providing the world with a clear statement of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about 9/11, has been publicized in Europe. A French magazine, Nexus, which sells on news kiosks throughout France, has featured the 9/11 Consensus Panel in 12 pages of its upscale glossy magazine.

The English translation of the title is "9/11: Case Closed?" Each of the 28 Consensus Points is summarized in turn, there is a good selection of photographs, and a page is devoted to 33 Consensus Panel footnotes backing up the summaries. The article, by Kim-Anh Lim, appeared in the March-April issue of Nexus, which costs 6.90 Euros and is not published on the Internet. However, a photograph of the cover shows the heading "11 Septembre: Les 28 points invalident la these officielle." There is a summary in French of the article online at the Nexus website.

Nexus is a large company that produces magazines in 13 countries around the world. Here is a description from their corporate web page:

“NEXUS is a bi-monthly alternative news magazine covering health breakthroughs, future science and technology, suppressed news, free energy, religious revisionism, conspiracy, the environment, history and ancient mysteries, the mind, UFOs, paranormal and the unexplained. NEXUS Magazine is not affiliated with any political, religious or spiritual groups or organizations whatsoever, and has been published since 1986. The magazine is on sale in shops across Australia, New Zealand, UK, France, Italy, Holland, Greece, Poland, Croatia, Japan, Romania, Serbia and Russia.”


Former NATO Advisor Challenges Official 9/11 Story

March, 2013

In a talk on European TV in 2012, the main proponents for a new investigation were:

Steinhäusler coordinated NATO-SST.CLG research activities (summary, paper) on terrorist risks for nuclear plants from 2001 to 2004. He is also a member of the Permanent Monitoring Panel on Mitigation of Terrorist Acts (PMP-MTA), World Federation of Scientists. Yet, like most physicists studying the topic he proposes questions concerning the collapse of the buildings. Considering that he is not only a physicist but also a academic in material science, this could make him another important expert in the debate.

Professor Daniele Ganser is a Swiss historian who specializes in international relations and international history from 1945 to today. Daniele Ganser is well known for his PhD thesis, "NATO's Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe" which was translated into ten languages. He teaches at Basel University. See this news item.

During the whole show, the audience was clearly on the side of Ganser and Steinhäusler and the whole way the discussion was held and led was very fair. The main opponent to Ganser and Steinhäusler was the journalist Stefan Aust (former chief editor of "Der Spiegel"). He tried in the usual ways to discredit their trustworthiness, but did not succeed at all.

The station broadcasting the talk was ServusTV, a division of "Red Bull". It is available free to air in Germany, Austria and Switzerland via antenna or cable and via satellite even europewide. This is not a small local TV station.

The above video is available as a Youtube video.

[Note: This article is adapted, with some additions, from a post on 911Blogger by 911_bavaria on Wed, 07/25/2012 - 10:08pm.]

© 2011-2013, Scientists for 9/11 Truth. All rights reserved. Contact: the Coordinator.