Recent Articles and Letters
Written by Our Members
January 24, 2016
Why Not Use a Plane? by Frank Legge and Ken Jenkins
April 10, 2014
Science, Activism, and the Pentagon Debate by Frank Legge
October 24, 2013
Released April 10, 2014
Letter to Massimo Mazzucco by David Chandler, Frank Legge, and John D. Wyndham
April 24, 2013
Response to Rachel Maddow by David Chandler
July 6, 2011
Book Review: "Among the Truthers" by William Willers
May 10, 2011
Responses to questions regarding thermite, nanothermite and
conventional explosives used in the WTC destruction by Steven Jones, 911Blogger.com.
January 19, 2011
Released April 15, 2011
Letters to John P. Holdren,
the Department of Commerce,
the Union of Concerned Scientists,
and the National Science Foundation by members of Scientists. Note:
In these copies, the sender's address has been replaced by Scientists' PO Box address.
March 19, 2011
An Open Letter to Bill Moyers by William Willers and others. The letter was in response to a
by Bill Moyers at the History Makers 2011 convention on January 27, 2011, in New York City.
March 07, 2011
A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse by Michael Fullerton, Foreign Policy Journal.
February 22, 2011
Letter to the Canadian Minister of Public Safety by Kip Warner. Responses to this letter by officials and
others can also be seen at this location.
November 18, 2010
Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11 by Kevin Ryan, Foreign Policy Journal.
September 15, 2010
Letter to the Department of Commerce by Timothy E. Eastman.
Welcome to our website and Home page. If you are new to the findings of independent, scientific research on the events of September 11, 2001
(9/11), please begin by clicking Introduction.
A new item has been added to the Recent Articles and Letters section on this page:
Why Not Use a Plane? by Frank Legge and Ken Jenkins, January 24, 2016.
The Pentagon Plane Puzzle
Members of Scientists and Others Publish New Pentagon Research
March 22, 2016 and April 29, 2016
The new research consists of:
(a) a video The
Pentagon Plane Puzzle by Ken Jenkins on the Pentagon witnesses,
(b) a talk
Going Beyond Speculation:
A Scientific Look at the Pentagon Evidence by David Chandler.
(c) a paper
The Pentagon Event: The Honegger Hypothesis Refuted
by authors Victoria Ashley, David Chandler, Jonathan H. Cole, Jim Hoffman, Ken Jenkins, Frank Legge,
and John D. Wyndham.
Except for Victoria Ashley and Jonathan H. Cole
for 9/11 Truth and Justice),
all of the foregoing individuals are members of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
(a) The Pentagon Plane Puzzle
Each year around the September 11th anniversary of the 9/11 event the
Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance
hosts a Film Festival. The 2015 Festival in Oakland, California included a
video by Ken Jenkins that presented the
testimonies of Pentagon eyewitnesses given to news media shortly after the event. The narrator points out
that, in an event seen by multiple witnesses, the most accurate description of the event is obtained by
examining "the common threads and recurring words" used by the witnesses. The observation common
to the great majority of the of the Pentagon witness testimonies given in the video is that on 9/11 a
large plane, identified by some as a Boeing 757, flew toward and impacted the Pentagon west wall.
Going Beyond Speculation
by David Chandler
(b) Going Beyond Speculation: A Scientific Look at the Pentagon Evidence
This is a talk on the Pentagon by David Chandler that was also given at the
2015 Film Festival in Oakland.
The talk was video-taped by Ken Jenkins who added supporting material before presenting it to the public along
with his Pentagon Plane Puzzle video.
Chandler's talk begins at 26:40 minutes in
the video with a review of World Trade Center research that points to the controlled demolition of three buildings,
the Twin Towers (WTC1/2) and Building 7 (WTC7) on September 11, 2001. Chandler then provides a compelling overview
of the Pentagon evidence that points to impact by a large plane, a Boeing 757-200 and most probably flight AA 77.
Chandler's emphasis is on use of the scientific method to draw the right conclusions from the eyewitness and
Plane Damage Path
Clipped tree, downed light poles, trailer/concrete wall gouges,
Impact hole, broken, bent and abraded columns, C ring exit hole,
Debris strewn in A&E driveway including plane parts.
(c) The Pentagon Event: The Honegger Hypothesis Refuted
The new paper is titled, "The Pentagon Event: The Honegger Hypothesis Refuted,"
by Victoria Ashley, David Chandler, Jonathan H. Cole, James Hoffman, Ken Jenkins,
Frank Legge, and John D. Wyndham. The paper can be found in the
Pentagon section of
the Scientific Method 9/11 website or directly at this
Honegger's hypothesis is that no plane impacted the Pentagon on September 11, 2001,
and that pre-planted explosives caused all the deaths and damage. Honegger also
postulates that a large "white" plane was destroyed outside the Pentagon west wall
without causing any damage to the wall.
The authors of the above paper refute Honegger's hypothesis and show that the physical, eyewitness,
radar, and FDR data, plus other data, all support impact by a large silver plane, a Boeing 757,
and most probably American Airlines Flight 77, as the main cause of all the deaths and damage.
© 2011-2016, Scientists for 9/11 Truth. All rights reserved. Contact: